- Promoting health and safety
- Creating mentally healthy workplaces
- Why is work health important?
- Healthy worker
- Working together: Promoting mental health and wellbeing at work
- Mental Health and Wellbeing - Participating and thriving in our workplaces
- Supporting ability at work
- Supporting health, performance and productivity
- Flexible work
- Building a resilient workforce
- Health Benefits of Work Programme
- Roles and responsibilities
- Duty Holders
- Comcare research program
- Health and safety representatives
- Investing in Experience: Age diversity in the workplace
- Work Health and Safety campaign program
- Education & training
- Creating mentally healthy workplaces
- Preventing harm
- Managing risks in the workplace
- Managing hazards
- Early intervention
- Recovery and return to work
- Recovery and rehabilitation
- Returning to work
- Returning to independence
- Claims and benefits
- Roles and responsibilities - claims
- Can I claim?
- Lodging a claim
- Assessing a claim
- Medical treatment
- Benefits and entitlements
- Frequently asked questions
- Online claims policy manual (eCPM)
- Reconsiderations and reviews
- Active Management Model
- Customer Information System (CIS)
- Our fraud policy
- Case managers
- Medical practitioners
- Forms & publications
- The scheme
- Overview of the Comcare scheme
- The WHS Act
- The SRC Act
- The ARC Act
- Authorities we work with
- Employers in the Comcare scheme
- Our compliance and enforcement activities
- Regulatory guides
- Regulator Performance Framework
- Cost recovery
- About us
- Organisational structure
- Comcare 2015–16 Corporate Plan
- Useful links
- Contact us
- Access to information
- Public Interest Disclosures
- Comcare diversity programme
- News & media
- 2016 National WHS Forums
- Comcare National Conference
- Comcare Work Health and Safety Awards
- Rehabilitation Case Manager Forums
- Past events
- 2016 Comcare Rehabilitation Case Manager Forum - May
- 2016 Chronic Pain: New Understanding, New Paradigm, New Approach
- 2015 Managing psychological injuries in the Comcare scheme
- 2015 Health and Safety Representative Forums
- 2014 Health and Safety Representative Forums
- 2014 National Conference
- 2013 National Conference
- 2014 Preventing psychological injury in changing workplaces forum
- 2013 Rehabilitation Case Manager Forum - May
- 2012 Comcare Asbestos Forum
- 2012 Rehabilitation Case Manager Forums - November
- 2012 National Conference
- 2012 Comcare Work Health and Safety Awards
- 2012 Rehabilitation Case Manager Forums - May
- 2011 National Conference
- Health and Safety Representative Forums Cairns/Townsville
- How to apply
- Temporary employment register
- Graduate Program
- Indigenous Graduate Program
- What we offer
- Working at Comcare
Companies charged over Adelaide workplace accidents
Federal workplace health and safety regulator Comcare has filed legal proceedings against two national employers over separate workplace incidents in Adelaide.
Comcare has filed complaints and summonses in the Adelaide Magistrates Court against waste management company Transpacific Industries Pty Ltd and construction company John Holland Pty Ltd.
Transpacific faces two charges, and John Holland three charges of breaching the Commonwealth Work Health and Safety Act 2011 over separate incidents within 24 hours of each other in Adelaide in 2013.
Each offence carries a maximum penalty of $1.5 million.
The charges against Transpacific relate to a fire at its Wingfield Chemical Waste Processing Plant near Port Adelaide on 25 July 2013.
Comcare alleges that Transpacific workers were conducting the company's first production-scale trial to distil a new industrial solvent from a chemical waste product when a flash fire broke out from a large distillation tank.
The force of the fire knocked a worker to the ground from a distance of around five metres, and he was treated in hospital for burns.
The John Holland matter involved an accident the following day, 26 July 2013, at the South Road Superway construction project in Adelaide's north.
The alleged incident occurred when a portal crane collided with an elevated work platform. The worker in the basket of the elevated work platform received medical treatment for his injuries.
It is alleged that both companies failed to ensure, so far as was reasonably practicable, the health and safety of their workers and exposed them to a risk of death or serious injury or illness.
The matters will be heard in the Adelaide Magistrates Court on dates to be set.
0478 305 675